First Citizens Bank and Trust Company, Inc. v. Taylor ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    First Citizens Bank and Trust Company, Inc.,
    Respondent,
    v.
    Ronald D. Taylor and Ted D. Smith, Appellants.
    Appellate Case No. 2015-002490
    Appeal From Greenville County
    Robin B. Stilwell, Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-471
    Submitted October 1, 2016 – Filed November 9, 2016
    AFFIRMED
    Randall Scott Hiller, of Greenville, for Appellants.
    Joey Randell Floyd, of Bruner Powell Wall & Mullins,
    LLC, of Columbia, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
    authorities: Rule 56(c), SCRCP (providing summary judgment is appropriate "if
    the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file,
    together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any
    material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of
    law"); Baughman v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 
    306 S.C. 101
    , 114, 
    410 S.E.2d 537
    , 545
    (1991) ("In reviewing the grant of a summary judgment motion, [appellate courts]
    apply the same standard which governs the [circuit] court . . . ."); Rule 10(c),
    SCRCP ("A copy of any plat, photograph, diagram, document, or other paper
    which is an exhibit to a pleading is a part thereof for all purposes if a copy is
    attached to such pleading."); Brazell v. Windsor, 
    384 S.C. 512
    , 516, 
    682 S.E.2d 824
    , 826 (2009) ("Petitioners explicitly stated that [a document] was attached and
    incorporated by reference into the complaint. Thus, they brought the [document]
    to the attention of [the circuit] court and were on notice of any information
    contained in it."); Burns v. Gardner, 
    328 S.C. 608
    , 614 n.2, 
    493 S.E.2d 356
    , 359
    n.2 (Ct. App. 1997) ("Because [a document] was attached to and incorporated in
    the amended complaint, we may consider it when ruling on the defendants' motion
    to dismiss."); 
    S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-520
    (a) (2005) (setting a twenty-year statute
    of limitations for "an action upon a bond or other contract in writing secured by a
    mortgage of real property").
    AFFIRMED.1
    HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A.J., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2016-UP-471

Filed Date: 11/9/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024