State v. Knight ( 2017 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Coy Lamar Knight, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002183
Appeal From Lancaster County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-035
Submitted November 1, 2016 – Filed January 11, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and
Coy Lamar Knight, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1
LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.