State v. Fraley ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
    CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
    EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    In The Court of Appeals
    The State, Respondent,
    v.
    Gary Curtis Fraley, Appellant.
    Appellate Case No. 2015-001737
    Appeal From Berkeley County
    Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge
    Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-305
    Submitted June 1, 2017 – Filed July 26, 2017
    AFFIRMED
    Appellate Defender John Harrison Strom, of Columbia,
    for Appellant.
    Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
    Attorney General Megan Harrigan Jameson, both of
    Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of
    Charleston, for Respondent.
    PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
    authorities:
    1. As to whether the trial court erred in refusing to charge the insanity defense:
    State v. Lewis, 
    328 S.C. 273
    , 278, 
    494 S.E.2d 115
    , 117 (1997) ("The law to be
    charged is determined from the facts presented at trial."); State v. Curry, 
    410 S.C. 46
    , 52, 
    762 S.E.2d 721
    , 724 (Ct. App. 2014) ("This court will not reverse a circuit
    court's decision to deny a specific request to charge unless the circuit court
    committed an error of law."); State v. Brown, 
    362 S.C. 258
    , 262, 
    607 S.E.2d 93
    , 95
    (Ct. App. 2004) ("If there is any evidence to support a jury charge, the trial [court]
    should grant the request."); Lewis, 
    328 S.C. at 277
    , 
    494 S.E.2d at 117
     ("Insanity is
    an affirmative defense to a prosecution for a crime."); 
    S.C. Code Ann. § 17-24
    -
    10(A) (2014) (providing a defendant is insane if "at the time of the commission of
    the act constituting the offense, the defendant, as a result of mental disease or
    defect, lacked the capacity to distinguish moral or legal right from moral or legal
    wrong or to recognize the particular act charged as morally or legally wrong");
    Lewis, 
    328 S.C. at 278
    , 
    494 S.E.2d at 117
     ("A defendant may rely on lay testimony
    to establish insanity."); 
    id.
     ("A requested charge on insanity is properly refused
    where there is no evidence tending to show the defendant was insane at the time of
    the crime charged.").
    2. As to whether the trial court erred in refusing to charge the lesser-included
    offenses to attempted murder: State v. Lewis, 
    328 S.C. 273
    , 278, 
    494 S.E.2d 115
    ,
    117 (1997) ("The law to be charged is determined from the fact presented at
    trial."); State v. Curry, 
    410 S.C. 46
    , 52, 
    762 S.E.2d 721
    , 724 (Ct. App. 2014)
    ("This court will not reverse a circuit court's decision to deny a specific request to
    charge unless the circuit court committed an error of law."); State v. Brown, 
    362 S.C. 258
    , 262, 
    607 S.E.2d 93
    , 95 (Ct. App. 2004) ("If there is any evidence to
    support a jury charge, the trial [court] should grant the request."); State v. Brayboy,
    
    387 S.C. 174
    , 179, 
    691 S.E.2d 482
    , 485 (Ct. App. 2010) ("In determining whether
    the evidence requires a charge on a lesser included offense, the court views the
    facts in a light most favorable to the defendant."); 
    S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-600
    (B)(1), (3) (2015) (providing assault and battery of a high and
    aggravated nature (ABHAN), a lesser-included offense of attempted murder,
    occurs when a person "unlawfully injures another person, and: (a) great bodily
    injury to another person results; or (b) the act is accomplished by means likely to
    produce death or great bodily injury"); § 16-3-600(C)(1), (3) (providing first-
    degree assault and battery, a lesser-included offense of attempted murder and
    ABHAN, occurs when "the person unlawfully: (a) injures another person, and the
    act: (i) involves nonconsensual touching of the private parts of a person . . . ; or (ii)
    occurred during the commission of a robbery, burglary, kidnapping, or theft; or (b)
    offers or attempts to injure another person with the present ability to do so, and the
    act: (i) is accomplished by means likely to produce death or great bodily injury; or
    (ii) occurred during the commission of a robbery, burglary, kidnapping, or theft");
    § 16-3-600(E)(1), (3) (providing third-degree assault and battery, a lesser-included
    offense of attempted murder, ABHAN, and first-degree assault and battery, occurs
    when a "person unlawfully injures another person, or offers or attempts to injure
    another person with the present ability to do so").
    AFFIRMED.1
    LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
    1
    We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2017-UP-305

Filed Date: 7/26/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024