Mueller v. SCDEW ( 2017 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Billie D. Mueller, Appellant,
v.
South Carolina Department of Employment and
Workforce, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2016-000037
Appeal From The Administrative Law Court
John D. McLeod, Administrative Law Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-333
Heard June 1, 2017 – Filed August 2, 2017
AFFIRMED
Billie D. Mueller, of Davis Station, pro se.
E.B. "Trey" McLeod, III, of The South Carolina
Department of Employment and Workforce, of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Billie Mueller appeals the South Carolina Administrative Law
Court's (ALC) order, affirming the Appellate Panel of the South Carolina
Department of Employment and Workforce's (Appellate Panel) determination that
Mueller's appeal was untimely. On appeal, Mueller argues (1) the ALC erred in
finding her appeal was untimely, (2) the ALC erred in finding she received the
decision from the Appellate Panel in a timely manner, and (3) the hearing officer
erred in determining severance payments and bonuses were not wages. We affirm1
pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:
1. As to issue 1: Engaging & Guarding Laurens Cty.'s Env't v. S.C. Dep't of Health
& Envtl. Control, 407 S.C. 334, 341, 755 S.E.2d 444, 448 (2014) ("[T]his [c]ourt's
review is limited to determining whether the ALC's findings were supported by
substantial evidence or were controlled by an error of law."); Kiawah Dev.
Partners, II v. S.C. Dep't of Health & Envtl. Control, 411 S.C. 16, 28, 766 S.E.2d
707, 715 (2014) ("In determining whether the ALC's decision was supported by
substantial evidence, the [c]ourt need only find, looking at the entire record on
appeal, evidence from which reasonable minds could reach the same conclusion as
the ALC."); S.C. Code Ann. § 41-35-660 (Supp. 2016) ("The claimant or any other
interested party may file an appeal from an initial determination, redetermination,
or subsequent determination not later than ten days after the determination was
mailed to his last known address.").
2. As to issues 2 and 3: Brown v. S.C. Dep't of Health & Envtl. Control, 348 S.C.
507, 519, 560 S.E.2d 410, 417 (2002) ("[I]ssues not raised to and ruled on by the
AL[C] are not preserved for appellate consideration.").
AFFIRMED.
SHORT, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.