State v. Clarke ( 2017 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Dalton Ellis Clarke, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-000801
Appeal From Charleston County
Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-463
Submitted November 1, 2017 – Filed December 13, 2017
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Susan Ranee Saunders, both of
Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of
Charleston, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dalton Ellis Clarke appeals his conviction on a charge of assault
and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN). He argues (1) the trial
court should have granted his requests to charge the jury on defense of others and
on a defendant's right to act on appearances and (2) he was entitled to a directed
verdict because the victim's death rendered it impossible for the State to prove the
elements of ABHAN. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the
following authorities:
1. As to Clarke's requests to charge: State v. Long, 325 S.C. 59, 64, 480 S.E.2d 62,
64 (1997) ("The law to be charged is determined from the evidence presented at
trial."); id. ("Under the theory of defense of others, one is not guilty of taking the
life of an assailant who assaults a friend, relative, or bystander if that friend,
relative, or bystander would likewise have the right to take the life of the assailant
in self-defense."); id. at 62, 480 S.E.2d at 63 ("To establish self-defense, the
defendant must establish (1) he was without fault in bringing on the difficulty; (2)
he actually believed he was in imminent danger of losing his life or sustaining
serious bodily injury; (3) a reasonably prudent person of ordinary firmness and
courage would have entertained the same belief; and (4) he had no other probable
means of avoiding the danger."); Gilchrist v. State, 364 S.C. 173, 179, 612 S.E.2d
702, 705 (2005) ("A defendant is entitled to an appearances charge where a claim
of self-defense arises from a mistaken appearance of danger.").
2. As to Clarke's directed verdict motion: State v. Kelsey, 331 S.C. 50, 62, 502
S.E.2d 63, 69 (1998) ("In reviewing the denial of a motion for a directed verdict,
the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State, and if there is
any direct evidence or any substantial circumstantial evidence reasonably tending
the prove the guilt of the accused, an appellate court must find that the case was
properly submitted to the jury."); State v. Needs, 333 S.C. 134, 145, 508 S.E.2d
857, 862 (1998) ("In the ordinary case, so long as the prosecutor has probable
cause to believe that the accused committed an offense defined by statute, the
decision whether or not to prosecute, and what charge to file or bring before a
grand jury, generally rests entirely in his discretion."); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-
600(B)(1) (2015) ("A person commits the offense of assault and battery of a high
and aggravated nature if the person unlawfully injures another person, and . . .
great bodily injury to another person results; or . . . the act is accomplished by
means likely to produce death or great bodily injury."); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-
600(A)(1) (2015) ("'Great bodily injury' means bodily injury which causes a
substantial risk of death or which causes serious, permanent disfigurement or
protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member or organ.").
AFFIRMED.1
LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.