Herring v. Bagnell ( 2017 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Jones G. Herring, Respondent,
v.
Gilbert S. Bagnell and Bagnell & Eason, LLC,
Appellants.
Appellate Case No. 2016-000772
Appeal From Richland County
Alison Renee Lee, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-453
Submitted November 1, 2017 – Filed December 6, 2017
AFFIRMED
Richard R. Gleissner and Luke Richard Gleissner, both
of Gleissner Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for
Appellants.
Douglas Neal Truslow, of Truslow & Truslow, of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Townes Assocs., Ltd. v. City of Greenville, 266 S.C. 81, 86, 221 S.E.2d
773, 775 (1976) ("In an action at law, on appeal of a case tried without a jury, the
findings of fact of the [circuit court] will not be disturbed upon appeal unless found
to be without evidence which reasonably supports the [circuit court's] findings.");
Austin v. Specialty Transp. Servs., Inc., 358 S.C. 298, 310-11, 594 S.E.2d 867, 873
(Ct. App. 2004) ("The [circuit court] has considerable discretion regarding the
amount of damages, both actual and punitive. Because of this discretion our
review on appeal is limited to the correction of errors of law. Our task in
reviewing a damages award is not to weigh the evidence, but to determine if there
is any evidence to support the damages award." (citations omitted)); Holy Loch
Distribs., Inc. v. Hitchcock, 340 S.C. 20, 26, 531 S.E.2d 282, 285 (2000) ("To
prevail in a legal malpractice claim, the plaintiff must satisfy the following four
elements: (1) the existence of an attorney-client relationship; (2) breach of duty by
the attorney; (3) damage to the client; and (4) proximate causation of client's
damage by the breach."); Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of Florence, 332 S.C. 75, 81,
504 S.E.2d 311, 314 (1998) ("It is well settled that by suffering a default, the
defaulting party is deemed to have admitted the truth of the plaintiff's allegations
and to have conceded liability."); Jackson v. Midlands Human Res. Ctr., 296 S.C.
526, 529, 374 S.E.2d 505, 506 (Ct. App. 1988) ("In a default case, the plaintiff
must prove by competent evidence the amount of his damages, and such proof
must be by a preponderance of the evidence."); id. ("[T]he award of damages must
be in keeping not only with the allegations of the complaint and the prayer for
relief, but also with the proof that has been submitted.").
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.