State v. Wells ( 2009 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Freddie Wells, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Florence County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-456
Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October 8, 2009   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Freddie Wells appeals the revocation of his probation.  Specifically, Wells contends the circuit court erred in revoking community supervision because the Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services presented inadequate evidence at the probation revocation hearing. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Hearn, C.J., Konduros, and Lockemy, JJ.,  concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.