State v. Farrow ( 2009 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Farrow, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Spartanburg County
Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-481
Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October 14, 2009 

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  James Farrow appeals his conviction and sentence for first-degree burglary, arguing the trial court erred in failing to set aside his conviction because the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.  Farrow also filed a separate pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Farrow's pro se brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HEARN, C.J., KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.