State v. Baggett ( 2009 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Joseph Baggett, Appellant.

---

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-475
Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October 13, 2009   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Joseph Baggett appeals his probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking his probation without holding a full evidentiary hearing.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.          

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.