State v. Weaver ( 2009 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Timeshia Weaver, Appellant.

---

Appeal From York County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-467
Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October 12, 2009   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Timeshia Weaver appeals the revocation of her probation, arguing the circuit court erred: (1) in revoking probation based on the non-judicially imposed condition that she must attend and complete substance abuse counseling; and (2) in failing to make a finding her probation violations were willful.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.          

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.