State v. Wall ( 2009 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Mary Ann Wall, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Williamsburg County
James E. Lockemy, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-463
Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October 12, 2009   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil K. Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Mary Ann Wall appeals her convictions and sentences for armed robbery, kidnapping, and possession of a weapon during a violent crime, arguing the trial court erred by refusing to direct a verdict of acquittal.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.