State v. Rogers ( 2009 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Karl Rogers, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Sumter County
George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-535
Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed November 19, 2009   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Karl Rogers appeals the revocation of his probation for forgery and committing a lewd act on a minor, arguing the circuit court deprived him of due process by ordering that he serve his sentences consecutively instead of concurrently.  After thoroughly reviewing the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss^[1] Rogers's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.