State v. Stacey E. Lingerfelt ( 2009 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Stacey E. Lingerfelt, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Cherokee County
J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-613
Submitted December 1, 2009 – Filed December 22, 2009   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Stacey E. Lingerfelt appeals the revocation of her probation, arguing the circuit court erred in revoking her probation because her probation had already terminated upon full payment of restitution in accordance with the sentencing court's order.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Lingerfelt's appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.