State v. Roberts ( 2009 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Antonio Roberts a/k/a Anthony Reese, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Richland County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-609
Submitted December 1, 2009 – Filed December 22, 2009   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Antonio Roberts a/k/a Anthony Reese appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing he was not afforded minimal due process prior to the circuit court's revocation of his probation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.