State v. Wade ( 2008 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

State, Respondent,

v.

Ryan O’Neal Wade, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Lancaster County
Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-392
Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 15, 2008   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,  all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Ryan O’Neal Wade appeals his guilty plea to shoplifting, third or more offense and probation revocation.  He was sentenced to concurrent sentences of six years for the shoplifting charge and his probation was revoked not to exceed five years.  Wade argues his guilty plea was involuntary because it did not comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Wade’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.