State v. Wright ( 2008 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Hollie Wright, Jr., Appellant.

---

Appeal From Richland County
Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-667
Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed December 8, 2008   

---

AFFIRMED

---

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Michelle J. Parsons, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Hollie Wright, Jr., appeals his conviction and sentence for criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature arguing the trial court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Tucker, 324 S.C. 155, 169, 478 S.E.2d 260, 267 (1996) (finding an issue waived for appellate review when a trial court’s offer of a curative instruction is refused); State v. Watts, 321 S.C. 158, 164, 467 S.E.2d 272, 276 (Ct. App. 1996) (finding a rejection of the trial court’s offer to give a curative instruction waives any complaint to the challenged testimony).

AFFIRMED.

HEARN, C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS,JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.