State v. Malloy ( 2008 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Keith Antonio Malloy, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Richland County
Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-659
Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed December 4, 2008 

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keith Antonio Malloy appeals his probation revocation, arguing the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his suspended sentence.    After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Malloy’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.