State v. Meetze ( 2009 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Heidi N. Meetze, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Richland County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-375
Submitted June 12, 2009 – Filed June 29, 2009  

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Heidi Meetze appeals her guilty plea and sentence, arguing her sentence is unconstitutionally disproportionate to the committed offense.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Meetze’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.   

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.