State v. Tuck ( 2003 )

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

---

The State,    Respondent,

v.

David Ray Tuck,    Appellant.

---

Appeal From Oconee County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-328
Submitted March 26, 2003 – Filed May 15, 2003

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Druanne D. White, of Anderson, for Respondent.

---

PER CURIAM:  David Ray Tuck pled guilty to criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature.  He was sentenced to three years, suspended upon the service of 150 days, plus nine months probation.  Tuck’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).  Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from representation, asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable merit.  Tuck did not file a pro se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON, and HUFF, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.