State v. Coe ( 2004 )

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Anthony Willard Coe Appellant.

---

Appeal From Richland County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-053
Submitted November 19, 2003 – Filed January 22, 2004

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Senior Assistant Appellant Defender, Wanda P. Hagler, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Anthony Willard Coe appeals from the revocation of his probation. Counsel for Coe attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Coe did not file a separate pro se brief.

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Coe’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

---

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.