State v. Amadeo ( 2004 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Gregory Amadeo, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Lexington County
James R. Barber, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-385
Submitted April 21, 2004 – Filed June 18, 2004

---

APPEAL DISMSISSED

---

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia;  and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Gregory Amadeo appeals his plea to charges of driving under the influence and of driving under suspension. Counsel for Amadeo attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Amadeo did not file a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Amadeo’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.