In the Interest of Rodriquez P. ( 2004 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In The Interest Of: Rodriquez P., Appellant.

---

Appeal From Bamberg County
Dale Moore Gable, Family Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-326
Submitted March 19, 2004 – Filed May 14, 2004

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Rodriquez pled guilty to second-degree burglary and disturbing a school.  The family court committed him to the Department of Juvenile Justice for an indeterminate period not to exceed his twenty-first birthday.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriquez’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved. Rodriquez did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Rodriquez’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. ^[1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concurring.

---

^[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.