State v. Williams ( 2004 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Titus Williams, Appellant.

---

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-299
Submitted February 23, 2004 – Filed May 5, 2004

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Senior Assistant  Appellate Defender Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Titus Williams appeals his convictions on distribution of crack cocaine and distribution of crack cocaine within the proximity of a park.  His appellate counsel has petitioned to be relieved as counsel, stating she has reviewed the record and has concluded Williams’s appeal is without merit.  The sole issue briefed by counsel generally argues the circuit court erred in “issuing an illegal sentence” in the case. In a separate pro se brief, Williams raises several issues related to his mistrial motion, sixth amendment rights, curative instructions, admission of evidence, and fourth amendment rights.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

---

[1]   We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.