State v. Pellum ( 2004 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Aaron W. Pellum, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Colleton County
Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-288
Submitted February 23, 2004 – Filed May 3, 2004

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Deputy Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Randolph  Murdaugh, of Hampton, for Respondent.

---

PER CURIAM:  Appellant was convicted of murder and first-degree burglary, and he was sentenced.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Appellant’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Appellant did not file a pro se response.   

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. [1]    

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.   

---

[1]   We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.