State v. Snider ( 2004 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Daniel Snider, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Anderson County
J.C. Buddy Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-573
Submitted November 1, 2004 – Filed November 16, 2004

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Acting Deputy Chief Attorney Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., J. Benjamin Aplin, Lovee M. Watts, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Daniel Snider appeals the revocation of his parole, arguing the trial court erroneously considered his failure to pay fees and fines in determining he violated parole.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Snider’s appeal under Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.