State v. Oxendine ( 2004 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Donald Mack Oxendine, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Dillon County
John M. Milling, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-563
Submitted November 1, 2004 – Filed November 8, 2004

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; Solicitor Jay E. Hodge, Jr., of Cheraw, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Donald Mack Oxendine appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary.  Counsel for Oxendine attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Oxendine filed a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Oxendine’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.