State v. Goodyear ( 2004 )

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Maxie Lee Goodyear, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Marion County
James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-625
Submitted December 1, 2004 –Filed December 10, 2004

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Maxie Lee Goodyear appeals his guilty pleas to assault and battery with intent to kill and assault with intent to kill.  Counsel for Goodyear attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Goodyear filed a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Goodyear’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.