Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. 3M Company ( 2023 )

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -149) On December 7, 2018, the Panel transferred 75 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 357 F.Supp.3d 1391 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 461 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of South Carolina. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of South Carolina and assigned to Judge Gergel. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of South Carolina for the reasons stated in the order of December 7, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. ~onlsh Foslont FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. > hy | ta Aug 23, 2023 4 5 ] CLERK'S OFFICE ET Tiffaney D. Pete Clerk of the Panel IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM−FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873 SCHEDULE CTO−149 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION ILLINOIS NORTHERN ILN 1 23−05205 Klass et al v. 3M Company et al MASSACHUSETTS MA 1 23−11675 Town of Kingston v. The 3M Company et al MA 1 23−11677 Town of Wrentham v. The 3M Company et al NEW JERSEY NJ 1 23−04069 TOWNSHIP OF FLORENCE v. 3M COMPANY et al NJ 2 23−04066 EISELE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al NJ 3 23−04067 TOWN OF CLINTON v. 3M COMPANY et al NEW YORK NORTHERN NYN 8 23−00932 Town of Plattsburgh v. The 3M Company et al NEW YORK SOUTHERN City of Mackinac Island v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota NYS 7 23−06527 Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al NYS 7 23−06547 Village of Maybrook v. The 3M Company et al NYS 7 23−06582 City of Swanville v. The 3M Company et al Brunswick Regional Water and Sewer H2GO v. The 3M NYS 7 23−06609 Company et al Willingboro Municipal Utilities Authority v. The 3M NYS 7 23−06689 Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al NYS 7 23−06722 City of Kannapolis v. The 3M Company et al NYS 7 23−06726 City of Robbinsdale v. The 3M Company et al NYS 7 23−06766 City of Sheffield v. The 3M Company et al NYS 7 23−06770 Village of Beverly v. The 3M Company et al NYS 7 23−06825 City of Waite Park v. The 3M Company et al NYS 7 23−06835 City of Plainview v. The 3M Company et al City of Maysville Utility Department v. The 3M Company et NYS 7 23−06865 NYS 7 23−07039 Colfax Water Supply v. The 3M Company et al NEW YORK WESTERN NYW 1 23−00791 Village of Westfield v. The 3M Company et al NYW 1 23−00792 Country Village Mobile v. The 3M Company et al NYW 6 23−06442 Town of Palmyra v. The 3M Company et al NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN NCE 5 23−00434 City of Goldsboro v. 3M Company et al NORTH CAROLINA MIDDLE NCM 1 23−00667 CITY OF HAMLET v. 3M COMPANY et al TEXAS NORTHERN TXN 4 23−00838 The State of Texas v. 3M Company et al WISCONSIN EASTERN Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. 3M Company WIE 2 23−01025 et al