Kiyemba v. Obama ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                         Cite as: 559 U. S. ____ (2010)                              1
    Per Curiam
    NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
    preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to
    notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash
    ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order
    that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
    JAMAL KIYEMBA ET AL. v. BARACK H. OBAMA,
    PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
    ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
    APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
    COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    No. 08–1234. Decided March 1, 2010
    PER CURIAM.
    We granted certiorari, 558 U. S. ___ (2009), on the ques
    tion whether a federal court exercising habeas jurisdiction
    has the power to order the release of prisoners held at
    Guantanamo Bay “where the Executive detention is in
    definite and without authorization in law, and release into
    the continental United States is the only possible effective
    remedy,” Pet. for Cert. i. By now, however, each of the
    detainees at issue in this case has received at least one
    offer of resettlement in another country. Most of the
    detainees have accepted an offer of resettlement; five
    detainees, however, have rejected two such offers and are
    still being held at Guantanamo Bay.
    This change in the underlying facts may affect the legal
    issues presented. No court has yet ruled in this case in
    light of the new facts, and we decline to be the first to do
    so. See, e.g., Cutter v. Wilkinson, 
    544 U. S. 709
    , 718, n. 7
    (2005) (“[W]e are a court of review, not of first view”).
    Under these circumstances, we vacate the judgment and
    remand the case to the United States Court of Appeals for
    the District of Columbia Circuit. It should determine, in
    the first instance, what further proceedings in that court
    or in the District Court are necessary and appropriate for
    2                   KIYEMBA v. OBAMA
    Per Curiam
    the full and prompt disposition of the case in light of the
    new developments.
    It is so ordered.