Daeche v. Bollschweiler , 36 S. Ct. 446 ( 1916 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455; Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 288; Hendricks v. United States, 223 U. S. 178, 184; (2) Benson v. Henkel, 198 U. S. 1, 10-11; Pierce v. Creecy, 210 U. S. 387, 401-402; (3) Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U. S. 420; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245; Henry v. Henkel, 235 U. S. 219.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 794

Citation Numbers: 241 U.S. 641, 36 S. Ct. 446, 60 L. Ed. 1217, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1373

Filed Date: 2/21/1916

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024