Kieldsen v. Barrett , 52 S. Ct. 28 ( 1931 )

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substaiitial federal question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.