Omaha National Bank v. Nebraskans for Independent Banking, Inc. , 96 S. Ct. 2616 ( 1976 )


Menu:
  • 426 U.S. 310 (1976)

    OMAHA NATIONAL BANK
    v.
    NEBRASKANS FOR INDEPENDENT BANKING, INC., ET AL.

    No. 75-1382.

    Supreme Court of United States.

    Decided June 7, 1976.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

    PER CURIAM.

    From the time petitioner Omaha National Bank sought approval from the Regional Administrator of National Banks of its drive-in/walk-in facility until after the en banc decision of the Court of Appeals, Nebraska law permitted a state-chartered bank to operate one "attached auxiliary teller office" and not more than two "detached auxiliary teller offices." Neb. Rev. Stat. § 8-157 (2) (1974). The two types of "auxiliary teller offices" were defined in Nebraska Department of Banking Reg. § 8-157-01 (1970). The Court of Appeals found it "abundantly clear" that a state bank situated like Omaha National would not be permitted to operate the added facility, and ruled that under 12 U. S. C. § 36, see First Nat. Bank v. Dickinson, 396 U. S. 122, 135 (1969), the facility was a branch which the bank was not permitted to operate. 530 F. 2d 755, 762 (CA8 1976).

    Since the en banc decision, § 8-157 (2) has been amended by Legislative Bill 763, approved by the Governor on March 11, 1976, to redefine "auxiliary teller" facilities which state banks may operate. It appearing *311 that this amendment, which will become effective in July 1976, may have a substantial bearing on the outcome of this case, the petition for certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Legislative Bill 763.

    So ordered.

Document Info

Docket Number: 75-1382

Citation Numbers: 48 L. Ed. 2d 658, 96 S. Ct. 2616, 426 U.S. 310, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 133

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 6/7/1976

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024

Cited By (28)

Ago ( 1976 )

Bluman v. Federal Election Commission , 800 F. Supp. 2d 281 ( 2011 )

state-of-missouri-ex-rel-w-r-kostman-commissioner-of-finance-v-first , 538 F.2d 219 ( 1976 )

arkansas-state-bank-commissioner-v-the-resolution-trust-corporation-an , 911 F.2d 161 ( 1990 )

state-bank-of-fargo-a-north-dakota-state-banking-association-v-the , 593 F.2d 341 ( 1979 )

state-of-utah-ex-rel-department-of-financial-institutions-and-w-s , 52 A.L.R. Fed. 642 ( 1980 )

United States v. Jose Avalos and Rudolfo Castrillon , 541 F.2d 1100 ( 1976 )

State Bank of Fargo v. MERCHANTS NAT. BANK & TRUST , 451 F. Supp. 775 ( 1978 )

Enrique Cervantes v. Ramiro Guerra , 651 F.2d 974 ( 1981 )

United States v. Vincent Austain Toner, Colm Murphy , 728 F.2d 115 ( 1984 )

State v. Garza , 241 Neb. 934 ( 1992 )

St. Louis County National Bank v. Mercantile Trust Company ... , 548 F.2d 716 ( 1976 )

Nebraskans for Independent Banking, Inc. v. The Omaha ... , 539 F.2d 673 ( 1976 )

Sea Ranch Ass'n v. California Coastal Commission , 552 F. Supp. 241 ( 1982 )

Foley v. Connelie , 419 F. Supp. 889 ( 1976 )

Nebraskans for Independent Banking, Inc. v. Omaha National ... , 423 F. Supp. 519 ( 1976 )

Jii v. Rhodes , 577 F. Supp. 1128 ( 1983 )

Chavez-Salido v. Cabell , 490 F. Supp. 984 ( 1980 )

Fred Fisher, on Behalf of Himself and on Behalf of All ... , 38 A.L.R. Fed. 792 ( 1977 )

dakota-national-bank-and-trust-co-a-national-banking-association-v-first , 554 F.2d 345 ( 1977 )

View All Citing Opinions »