State v. Kanstrup , 57 S.D. 385 ( 1930 )

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted in the court below (if the crime of perjury, and, from the judgment and a denial of her motion for new trial, she 'has appealed.

The evidence of appellant’s guilt is clear and convincing, and a careful examination of the errors assigned fails to show anything prejudicial to the substantial or constitutional rights of appellant. The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.

All the Judges concur.