-
Dugro, J. That there should be affirmance in these cases follows from Jordan v. Railway Co., 18 N. Y. Supp. 205, (decided at this term.) No errors requiring reversal appear in the admission of the evidence objected to in the Lubin and the Ludovici cases. Judgments affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 18 N.Y.S. 207
Judges: Dugro
Filed Date: 3/14/1892
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024