Hirshberger v. Manhattan Ry. Co. , 18 N.Y.S. 955 ( 1892 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The questions raised by the appellants in this case are the same that have been decided unfavorably to them in Seebach v. Railroad Co., 18 N. Y. Supp. 208, (argued this term.) Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 18 N.Y.S. 955

Filed Date: 3/14/1892

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024