Barrett v. Smith , 19 N.Y.S. 1020 ( 1892 )

Per Curiam.

It was not error to allow the plaintiff to show that the witness Vero had said at the time of his arrest: “Is this the 108th street racket?” for this evidence tended to show that Vero testified untruly when he, upon his direct examination, said: “Ho unusual accident was brought to my attention, except when I was arrested.” Upon the whole case the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.