Millard v. Comm'r , 90 T.C.M. 136 ( 2005 )

ARTHUR F. MILLARD, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Millard v. Comm'r

No. 3713-04

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2005-192; 2005 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 192; 90 T.C.M. (CCH) 136;

August 8, 2005, Filed

---

Arthur F. Millard, pro se.

Travis T. Vance III, for respondent.

Wells, Thomas B.

---

THOMAS B. WELLS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WELLS, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $ 2,764 in petitioner's Federal income tax for 2001. The issue to be decided is whether petitioner's 2001 gross income includes the amount of a check petitioner received but did not cash in 2001. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Background

The parties submitted the instant case, fully stipulated, without trial, pursuant to Rule 122. The parties' stipulations of fact are hereby incorporated by this reference and are found as facts in the instant case.

At the time of filing the petition, petitioner resided in Doraville, Georgia. During 2001, petitioner owned an individual retirement account (IRA) with SouthTrust Bank. On May 10, 2001, SouthTrust Bank issued to petitioner a check in the amount of $ 10,841.06 (the original check). SouthTrust Bank debited petitioner's IRA account by $ 10,841.06 and recorded the transaction as a premature distribution. Subsequently, SouthTrust Bank submitted to respondent a 2001 Form 1099-R, reporting a taxable distribution of $ 10,841.06. The records of SouthTrust Bank indicated a zero balance in petitioner's IRA account as of January 15, 2002.

On March 21, 2003, petitioner presented the original check to SouthTrust Bank for payment. SouthTrust Bank canceled the original check but issued petitioner a second check in the amount of $ 10,841.06 (the replacement check), which reflected the current date.

On December 1, 2003, respondent mailed to petitioner's last known address a statutory notice of deficiency with respect to petitioner's 2001 tax year. Respondent determined that a deficiency resulted from petitioner's failure to include the amount of the check in gross income for 2001. In addition to the regular tax liability, respondent determined that a 10-percent additional tax applied to the amount of the check pursuant to section 72(t). Petitioner timely filed a petition with this Court for a redetermination of the deficiency.

Discussion

Respondent contends that the distribution of the original check by SouthTrust Bank constituted an IRA distribution and, consequently, the amount of the original check must be included in petitioner's gross income in the year of receipt. Petitioner concedes that he initiated closure of the IRA account and received the original check from SouthTrust Bank in 2001. However, petitioner contends that, because he did not endorse or negotiate the original check, the account remained open throughout 2001. Relying on articles 3 and 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted by Georgia and related caselaw, petitioner contends that the original check and the underlying funds remained the property of SouthTrust Bank during the year in issue, and, consequently, the receipt of the original check did not constitute the receipt of taxable income by petitioner. The statutes petitioner cites include Ga. Code Ann. secs. 11-3-101 and 11-4-101 (1981). Citing A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. Paulk, 25 Bankr. 913 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1982), petitioner contends that a check is not a financial statement or money but is evidence of debt. Petitioner also cites United States v. Forcellati, 610 F.2d 25">610 F.2d 25 (1st Cir. 1979), as illustrative of the proposition of negotiable instruments law that the drawer of a check retains ownership of the check.

Section 61(a) provides that gross income includes all income from whatever source derived, subject only to the exclusions otherwise provided.^{section 61(a), Congress intended "to exert 'the full measure of its taxing power' and to bring within the definition of income any 'accession to wealth.'" United States v. Burke,504 U.S. 229">504 U.S. 229, 233, 119 L. Ed. 2d 34">119 L. Ed. 2d 34, 112 S. Ct. 1867">112 S. Ct. 1867 (1992) (citations omitted). Consequently, the definition of gross income has a broad scope, and exclusions are construed narrowly. Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323">515 U.S. 323, 327-328, 132 L. Ed. 2d 294">132 L. Ed. 2d 294, 115 S. Ct. 2159">115 S. Ct. 2159 (1995); Commissioner v. Jacobson, 336 U.S. 28">336 U.S. 28, 49, 93 L. Ed. 477">93 L. Ed. 477, 69 S. Ct. 358">69 S. Ct. 358, 1949 C.B. 40">1949 C.B. 40, 1 C.B. 40">1949-1 C.B. 40 (1949).}

Section 408(d)(1) provides that any amount paid or distributed out of an individual retirement plan must be included in gross income by the distributee in the manner provided under section 72, ^{Sec. 7701(a)(37). However, the amount distributed from an individual retirement plan is not subject to tax if the amount is rolled over into an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity within 60 days of the distribution. See sec. 408(d)(3). In the instant case, petitioner concedes that he made no rollover contribution after receiving the original check from SouthTrust Bank.}

Cash method taxpayers must include all items of gross income in the taxable year of actual or constructive receipt. Section 1.451-2(a), Income Tax Regs., sets forth the general rule for constructive receipt of income as follows:

  (a) General rule. Income although not actually reduced to a

   taxpayer's possession is constructively received by him in the

   taxable year during which it is credited to his account, set

   apart for him, or otherwise made available so that he may draw

   upon it at any time, or so that he could have drawn upon it

   during the taxable year if notice of intention to withdraw had

   been given. However, income is not constructively received if

   the taxpayer's control of its receipt is subject to substantial

   limitations. * * *

Consequently, a cash method taxpayer constructively receives income as of the date that a check is received absent a substantial limitation. Furstenberg v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. 755">83 T.C. 755, 791 n. 28 (1984); Kahler v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 31">18 T.C. 31, 34-35 (1952); Roberts v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2002-281">T.C. Memo 2002-281. In the instant case, the record reflects that the original check was not subject to substantial limitations, and petitioner makes no contention otherwise. Consequently, we find that petitioner constructively received $ 10,841.06 of income upon his receipt of the original check in 2001. ^{*199 Petitioner's reliance on Georgia commercial statutes and related caselaw is misplaced. While State law creates legal interests and rights, it does not override the Federal doctrine of constructive receipt as set forth in the Code and the regulations, since it is Federal law that designates which of those interests and rights is taxed. See Walter v. United States, 148 F.3d 1027">148 F.3d 1027, 1029 (8th Cir. 1998) (" We agree that the law of negotiable instruments provides a useful backdrop, but it cannot trump the doctrine of constructive receipt as developed in the Internal Revenue Code and its implementing Treasury Regulations.").}

Section 72(t)(1) provides that a 10-percent additional tax applies to any amount received from a qualified retirement plan, subject to exceptions enumerated in section 72(t)(2). ^{*200 To reflect the foregoing,}

Decision will be entered for respondent.

APPENDIX

[EDITOR'S NOTE: Appendix Reported at: 2005 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 302">2005 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 302]

---

Footnotes

• 1. SEC. 61. GROSS INCOME DEFINED.

    (a) General Definition. -- Except as otherwise provided in this

     subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source

     derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:

             *   *   *   *   *   *   *

       (9) Annuities;↩

• 2. Sec. 72(a) provides:

    SEC. 72(a). General Rule for Annuities. -- Except as otherwise

     provided in this chapter, gross income includes any amount

     received as an annuity (whether for a period certain or during

     one or more lives) under an annuity, endowment, or life

     insurance contract.↩

• 3. Sec. 1.446-1(c)(1)(i), Income Tax Regs., provides:

    (i) Cash receipts and disbursements method. Generally, under the

     cash receipts and disbursements method in the computation of

     taxable income, all items which constitute gross income (whether

     in the form of cash, property, or services) are to be included

     for the taxable year in which actually or constructively

     received. * * *.↩

• 4. Petitioner was also in actual receipt of the check, which we have held to constitute a cash equivalent. In Martin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-331 (citing Lavery v. Commissioner, 158 F.2d 859">158 F.2d 859, 860 (7th Cir. 1946), affg. 5 T.C. 1283">5 T.C. 1283 (1945)), affd. 987 F.2d 770">987 F.2d 770↩ (5th Cir. 1993), we stated: "The receipt of a check is tantamount to the receipt of cash, even if the check is not deposited or otherwise negotiated, provided that its receipt is not subject to 'substantial limitations' and there is no reason to suppose that it will be dishonored,"

• 5. Sec. 72(t) provides:

    SEC. 72(t). 10-Percent Additional Tax on Early Distributions

     From Qualified Retirement Plans. --

       (1) Imposition of additional tax. -- If any taxpayer

       receives any amount from a qualified retirement plan (as

       defined in section 4974(c)), the taxpayer's tax under this

       chapter for the taxable year in which such amount is

       received shall be increased by an amount equal to 10

       percent of the portion of such amount which is includible

       in gross income.

       (2) Subsection not to apply to certain distributions. --

       Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), paragraph (1)

       shall not apply to any of the following distributions:

          (A) In general. -- Distributions which are --

            (i) made on or after the date on which the

            employee attains age 59 1/2,

            (ii) made to a beneficiary (or to the estate of

            the employee) on or after the death of the

            employee,

            (iii) attributable to the employee's being

            disabled within the meaning of subsection (m)(7),

            (iv) part of a series of substantially equal

            periodic payments (not less frequently than

            annually) made for the life (or life expectancy)

            of the employee or the joint lives (or joint life

            expectancies) of such employee and his designated

            beneficiary,

            (v) made to an employee after separation from

            service after attainment of age 55,

            (vi) dividends paid with respect to stock of a

            corporation which are described in section

            404(k), or

            (vii) made on account of a levy under section

            6331 on the qualified retirement plan.↩