State v. Wilbert Rogers ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
    AT JACKSON                        FILED
    SEPTEMBER 1997 SESSION                     October 17, 1997
    Cecil Crowson, Jr.
    Appellate C ourt Clerk
    STATE OF TENNESSEE,             )
    )     NO. 02C01-9611-CR-00418
    Appellee,                 )
    )     SHELBY COUNTY
    VS.                             )
    )
    )     HON. CHRIS CRAFT, JUDGE
    WILBERT K. ROGERS               )
    (A.K.A. PERSON ROGERS),         )     (Second degree murder)
    )
    Appellant.                )
    FOR THE APPELLANT:                    FOR THE APPELLEE:
    A. C. WHARTON, JR.                    JOHN KNOX WALKUP
    Shelby County Public Defender         Attorney General and Reporter
    WALKER GWINN (On appeal)              SARAH M. BRANCH
    TONY N. BRAYTON (At trial)            Assistant Attorney General
    Assistant Public Defenders            450 James Robertson Parkway
    201 Poplar Ave.                       Nashville, TN 37243-0493
    Suite 201
    Memphis, TN 38103                     WILLIAM GIBBONS
    District Attorney General
    AMY WEIRICH
    Assistant District Attorney General
    201 Poplar Ave.
    Suite 301
    Memphis, Tennessee 38103
    OPINION FILED:
    AFFIRMED
    JOE G. RILEY,
    JUDGE
    OPINION
    Defendant was convicted by a Shelby County jury of second degree murder
    and sentenced to thirty-three (33) years as a Range II, Multiple Offender. Defendant
    brings one issue for our review: whether the judgment should be modified to criminal
    attempt to commit murder because the victim’s death did not occur within a year and
    a day of the alleged mortal wound. We find that the Criminal Sentencing Reform Act
    of 1989 abolished this common law defense and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
    FACTS
    Although the sufficiency of the evidence is not at issue, a review of the facts
    is instructive. Lisa Sledge, paramour of the victim, James Bowdery, testified that on
    May 6, 1994, she had been entertaining the victim during the afternoon of the
    incident when the defendant arrived to do his laundry, a standard practice. Sledge,
    Bowdery, and the defendant played cards and drank until about 8:00 p.m. Sledge
    and Bowdery went to sleep in the upstairs bedroom. Defendant was asleep on the
    downstairs sofa. At some point before daybreak, the defendant came into the
    bedroom asking where his money was, stabbed the victim with a butcher knife, and
    left. Ms. Sledge called 9-1-1.
    Dr. Jerry T. Francisco, a pathologist, testified at trial. Although the victim did
    not die until August 7, 1995, Dr. Francisco attributed the cause of death to the
    wounds sustained on May 7, 1994. His review of the medical records showed that
    Bowdery was stabbed in the heart, which caused the heart to stop. As a result, he
    developed cerebral hypoxia. This deprivation of oxygen to the brain caused him to
    become comatose. He remained in this vegetative state and developed a kidney
    infection, which is not unusual for such patients. He died on August 7, 1995,
    approximately sixteen (16) months after the defendant had wounded him.
    Defendant presented no proof.
    COMMON LAW DEFENSE
    2
    The sole issue on appeal is whether the second degree murder
    conviction must be modified since the victim did not die within a year and a day of the
    infliction of the mortal wound. The “year-and-a-day rule” was the common law
    requirement. See Percer v. State, 
    118 Tenn. 765
    , 
    103 S.W. 780
     (1907); Cole v.
    State, 
    512 S.W.2d 598
     (Tenn. Crim. App. 1974).
    This Court has considered this question previously in State v. Ruane, 
    912 S.W.2d 766
    , 774 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995), and held the Criminal Sentencing Reform
    Act of 1989 abolished common law defenses. Affirmative defenses are listed by
    statute, and the “year-and-a-day rule” is not listed among those defenses now
    available. Id.; 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-11-204
    . Furthermore, 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 39
    -
    11-203(e)(2) specifically abolishes all common law defenses.           We, therefore,
    conclude the “year-and-a-day rule” defense is no longer viable in Tennessee.
    Defendant’s contention that the abolition of this defense is an ex post facto
    violation is also without merit. 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-11-203
     went into effect in 1989.
    The mortal wound was inflicted in 1994.
    CONCLUSION
    The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in all respects.
    JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
    CONCUR:
    3
    JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE
    DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02C01-9611-CR-00418

Filed Date: 10/17/1997

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014