eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
 2001-08

State of Tennessee v. Donald J. Moore - Dissenting ( 2001 )


Menu:
 
  •          IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE
June 19, 2001 Session
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DONALD J. MOORE
Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County
No. 29,824F John W. Rollins, Judge
No. M2000-02621-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 7, 2001
THOMAS T. WOODALL , J., dissenting.
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case. First, I am compelled to note
that there is not a transcript of the guilty plea hearing in the record. It is well settled that when a
defendant appeals a sentencing issue and fails to provide a transcript of the guilty plea hearing in the
record, that this court presumes that the action of the trial court was correct. See State v. Keen,
    996 S.W.2d 842
    , 844 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999); State v. Griffis,
    964 S.W.2d 577
    , 592-93 (Tenn. Crim.
App. 1997).
In addition, even if the transcript of the guilty plea hearing had not been omitted, I
respectfully conclude that if the judgment of the trial court must be reversed, the matter should be
remanded to give the trial court the opportunity to state on the record why he denied judicial
diversion. See State v. Herron,
    767 S.W.2d 151
    , 156 (Tenn. 1989) (requiring a trial court to clearly
state on the record its specific reasons for denying judicial diversion, in order to allow for meaningful
appellate review); see also, State v. Hammersley,
    650 S.W.2d 352
    , 355 (Tenn. 1983); State v.
Bonestel, 871 S.W.2d 163,168 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993), overruled on other grounds by State v.
Hooper,
    29 S.W.3d 1
    , 9 (Tenn. 2000). Whether an accused should be granted judicial diversion is
a question which addresses itself to the sound discretion of the trial court. Bonestel, 871 S.W.2d at
168. This court will not interfere with the refusal of the trial court to grant judicial diversion if there
is “any substantial evidence to support the refusal contained in the record.” Id. When the trial court
errs by failing to state on the record his reasons for denying judicial diversion, the matter should be
remanded for clarification by the trial court. For this court to grant judicial diversion in this
particular case, without a remand to the trial court, would be substituting our discretion for the
discretion of the trial court.
__________________________________________
THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE