Corey Alan Bennett v. State of Tennessee ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
    AT JACKSON
    COREY ALAN BENNETT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County
    No. 2014CR229      Joe H. Walker, III, Judge
    ________________________________
    No. W2015-00442-COA-R3-CV – Filed September 2, 2015
    _________________________________
    The notice of appeal was not timely filed and therefore, this appeal must be
    dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed
    KENNY ARMSTRONG, J., J. STEVEN STAFFORD, P.J.W.S., AND ARNOLD B. GOLDIN, J.
    Corey Alan Bennett, Nashville, Tennessee, pro se.
    Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General and Reporter; and Jennifer L. Brenner, Senior
    Counsel, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION1
    The thirty-day time limit for filing a notice of appeal set forth in Rule 4 of the
    Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure is mandatory and jurisdictional in civil matters.
    Albert v. Frye, 
    145 S.W.3d 526
    , 528 (Tenn. 2004); Binkley v. Medling, 
    117 S.W.3d 252
    ,
    255 (Tenn. 2003). The Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure expressly prohibit this
    Court from either waiving or extending that time period. See T.R.A.P. 2 and 21(b). Thus,
    the failure to timely file a notice of appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction to hear the
    matter and therefore, this appeal must be dismissed.
    1
    Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee provides:
    This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm,
    reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal
    opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum
    opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION”, shall not be published, and
    shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.
    In this case, it appears that a final order was entered on December 9, 2014, and
    there is no indication that any of the motions listed in Rule 4(b) were timely filed. Thus,
    the Appellant’s notice of appeal should have been filed within thirty days after December
    9, 2014. See Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a). The Appellant, however, did not file a notice of
    appeal until February 18, 2015, and February 18, 2015, is more than thirty days after
    December 9, 2014.
    By Order entered on July 24, 2015, the Court directed Appellant to, within twenty
    (20) days from the entry of that Order, show cause why this appeal should not be
    dismissed for failure to timely file the Notice of Appeal. Our Order of July 24, 2015, also
    provided that “[f]ailure to comply with this Order within the time provided herein could
    result in dismissal of this appeal without further notice.” On that same date, the Clerk of
    this Court transmitted a copy of our Order to Appellant by certified mail, return receipt
    requested. The Clerk later received the return receipt indicating that Appellant received
    the mail parcel on August 11, 2015. As of this date, Appellant has not responded to our
    Order of July 24, 2015.
    Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, this Court lacks subject matter
    jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Consequently, the appeal must be dismissed.
    Conclusion
    For the foregoing reasons, we dismiss this appeal for failure to timely file the
    notice of appeal. Costs of this appeal are taxed to the appellant, Corey Alan Bennett, for
    which execution may issue if necessary.
    PER CURIAM
    

Document Info

Docket Number: W2015-00442-COA-R3-CV

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 9/2/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/2/2015