Redland Insurance Company v. Don Willis ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
    AT NASHVILLE
    Assigned January11, 2012
    REDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY v. DON WILLIS
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County
    No. 08C2231     Barbara N. Haynes, Judge
    No. M2011-02158-COA-R3-CV -Filed January 12, 2012
    The appellant has appealed from an August 30, 2011 final judgment awarding him $1733.00
    in damages. Because the appellant did not file his notice of appeal with the trial court clerk
    within the time permitted by Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a), we dismiss the appeal.
    Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed
    F RANK G. C LEMENT, J R., J., A NDY D. B ENNETT, J., and R ICHARD H. D INKINS, J.
    Don Willis, Madison, Tennessee, Pro Se.
    William G. McCaskill, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Redland Insurance
    Company.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
    This appeal involves a dispute between a truck driver and his insurance carrier over
    the carrier’s liability under a commercial trucker’s policy for property damage to the truck
    driver’s tractor trailer. The truck driver, Don Willis, obtained a $12,000 default judgment
    against Redland Insurance Company ("Redland") in the General Sessions Court for Davidson
    1
    Tenn. Ct. App. R. 10 states:
    This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse
    or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion
    would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall
    be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION,” shall not be published, and shall not be cited
    or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.
    County on March 25, 2008. On July 9, 2008, Redland filed a “Petition for Writ of Certiorari,
    Supersedeas and Order Setting Aside Default Judgment” in the Circuit Court for Davidson
    County. On September 23, 2008, the trial court set aside the default judgment entered by the
    General Sessions Court. Redland subsequently filed a motion to dismiss Mr. Willis’s
    underlying property damage claims or in the alternative to determine the amount of damages
    to which Mr. Willis is entitled. On August 30, 2011, the trial court entered a final judgment
    denying Redland’s motion to dismiss and awarding Mr. Willis $1733.00 in damages. Mr.
    Willis filed a notice of appeal with the trial court clerk on September 30, 2011.
    Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a) requires that a notice of appeal be filed with and received by the
    trial court clerk within thirty (30) days after entry of the order appealed. Mr. Willis filed his
    notice of appeal thirty-one (31) days after entry of the final judgment. Consequently, on
    December 29, 2011, this court ordered Mr. Willis to show cause why his appeal should not
    be dismissed for failure to file a timely notice of appeal. Mr. Willis has responded that he
    was pressed for time and “failed to notice the last day of September was the 31 st instead of
    th
    the 30 .” He sets forth the merits of his appeal, and requests that the appeal be honored.
    We understand from Mr. Willis’s response that he was unaware August had 31 days
    and that the notice of appeal was thus due on September 29, 2011, rather than on September
    30, 2011. The reason for the late filing is, however, irrelevant. The thirty day time limit for
    filing a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. Albert v. Frye, 
    145 S.W.3d 526
    , 528
    (Tenn.2004); Binkley v. Medling, 
    117 S.W.3d 252
    , 255 (Tenn. 2003). This court can neither
    waive nor extend the time period. Tenn. R. App. P. 2 and 21(b); Flautt & Mann v. Council
    of City of Memphis, 
    285 S.W.3d 856
    , 869 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008); Jefferson v. Pneumo Serv.
    Corp. 
    699 S.W.2d 181
    , 184 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985). The failure to file a timely notice of
    appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction to hear the matter. Flautt & Mann v. Council of City
    of Memphis, 285 S.W.3d at 869. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.
    The appeal is hereby dismissed for failure to file a timely notice of appeal. The costs
    are taxed to Don Willis for which execution, if necessary, may issue.
    PER CURIAM
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M2011-02158-COA-R3-CV

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 1/12/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014