Brett Hanson v. Sarah J. Levan ( 2021 )

Court of Appeals Opinions | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

• Court of Appeals
  • About
  • News
  • Judges
  • Opinions
  • Oral Arguments
  • Rules
  • COA Oral Argument Videos
  • Proposed Rules & Amendments
• Supreme Court
• Court of Criminal Appeals
• Appellate Court Clerk's Office
• Circuit, Criminal, Chancery & Business Courts
• General Sessions Courts
• Juvenile & Family Courts
• Municipal Courts
• Court Clerks
• Court Rules

SEARCH TNCOURTS.GOV:

Search this site:

• Connect with us on Twitter
• Help Center
• Opinions & News Feeds
• View Photos on Flickr
• Podcast
• Subscribe To Our YouTube
• Appellate E-Filing

• ADA Policy
• Employment
• Board of Judicial Conduct
• Records Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Site Map
• Contact Us

Administrative Office of the Courts
511 Union Street, Suite 600
Nashville, TN 37219

© 2021 Tennessee Courts System

• Courts
  • Supreme Court
  • Court of Appeals
  • Court of Criminal Appeals
  • Appellate Court Clerk's Office
  • Circuit, Criminal, Chancery & Business Courts
  • General Sessions Courts
  • Juvenile & Family Courts
  • Municipal Courts
  • Court Clerks
  • Court Rules
• Programs
  • Access to Justice
  • Court Improvement
  • Court Interpreters
  • Court Reporters
  • GAVELS Program
  • Indigent Defense
  • Mediation
  • Parenting Plan
  • RFPs/Grants
  • SCALES Project
  • Self Help Center
• Administration
  • Continuing Legal Education
  • Judicial Resources
  • Human Resources
  • Training Courses
  • Links
  • History
  • Memorials
• Forms & Publications
  • Court Forms
  • Guides & Resources
  • Other Forms
  • Publications
  • Reports
  • Statistical Reports
  • Criminal Justice Handbook Order Form
• Boards & Commissions
  • Board of Judicial Conduct
  • Boards and Commissions
  • Advisory Task Force on Composition of Judicial Districts
  • Indigent Representation Task Force
• Calendar

You are here: Home  >  Courts  >  Court of Appeals  >  print

Court of Appeals Opinions

Court

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Format: 10/25/2021

And:

Format: 10/25/2021

Case Number

Case Name

keyword search

Sort by:

Order:

Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21
Brett Hanson Et Al. v. Sarah J. Levan Et Al. E2020-01581-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J. Trial Court Judge: Judge Deborah C. Stevens In this healthcare liability action, the plaintiff sued several medical professionals and facilities. Following an amended complaint, which had removed multiple parties from the action, the remaining defendants filed their answer to the amended complaint that included allegations of comparative fault against a doctor that the plaintiff had removed as a party to the action in the amended complaint. The defendants did not file a certificate of good faith in compliance with Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-26-122, which is required when a defendant alleges comparative fault against a “non-party.” Following a motion by the plaintiff, the trial court entered an order striking the defendants’ allegations of comparative fault. The trial court further found that the defendants had not demonstrated good cause to support an extension of time to file a certificate of good faith. Discerning no error, we affirm.	Knox County	Court of Appeals	10/25/21

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• …
• next ›
• last »