In Re: Dakota D. ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
    AT KNOXVILLE
    Assigned on April 24, 2013
    IN RE: DAKOTA D., ET AL.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Anderson County
    No. B2LA0237      William E. Lantrip, Chancellor
    No. E2013-00229-COA-R3-JV-FILED-APRIL 24, 2013
    The order from which the appellant, Charlie D., seeks to appeal was entered on November
    30, 2012. The Notice of Appeal was filed on January 4, 2013, more than thirty (30) days
    from the date of entry of the November 30, 2012 order. Because the Notice of Appeal was
    not timely filed, we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal.
    Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed
    T HOMAS R. F RIERSON, II, J., C HARLES D. S USANO, J R., P.J., AND D. M ICHAEL S WINEY, J.
    Kevin D. Angel, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, for the appellant, Charlie D.
    Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter, and Derek C. Jumper, Assistant
    Attorney General, General Civil Division, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Tennessee
    Department of Children’s Services.
    Timothy G. Elrod, Knoxville, Tennessee, Guardian Ad Litem.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
    By order entered on March 28, 2013, this Court directed the appellant to show cause
    why this appeal should not be dismissed “as having been untimely filed.” In response to that
    order, counsel for the appellant filed a motion asking this Court to find “good cause” for the
    late filing of the Notice of Appeal. The motion is supported by an affidavit from counsel and
    other documents seeking to demonstrate that the Notice of Appeal was filed “less than a
    week” after counsel became aware of the entry of the final order to which the Notice of
    Appeal was directed. The motion does not dispute that the final order was entered on
    November 30, 2012, or that the Notice of Appeal was not filed until January 4, 2013.
    In order to be timely, a notice of appeal must “be filed with and received by the clerk
    of the trial court within 30 days after the date of entry of the judgment appealed from.”
    Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a). “The thirty-day time limit for filing a notice of appeal is mandatory
    and jurisdictional in civil cases.” Albert v. Frye, 
    145 S.W.3d 526
    , 528 (Tenn. 2004). If a
    Notice of Appeal is not filed in a civil case in a timely fashion from the date of entry of the
    final judgment, we are not at liberty to waive the procedural defect and must dismiss the
    appeal. See Arfken & Assocs., P.A. v. Simpson Bridge Co., Inc., 
    85 S.W.3d 789
    , 791 (Tenn.
    Ct. App. 2002); Am. Steinwinter Investor Group v. Am. Steinwinter, Inc., 
    964 S.W.2d 569
    ,
    571 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997); Jefferson v. Pneumo Services Corp., 
    699 S.W.2d 181
    , 184 (Tenn.
    Ct. App. 1985).
    Because the Notice of Appeal in this case was filed more than thirty (30) days after
    the date of entry of the final order, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal. This appeal
    is dismissed. Costs on appeal are taxed to the appellant, Charlie D., for which execution may
    issue if necessary.
    PER CURIAM
    1
    Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides as follows:
    This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may
    affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum
    opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When
    a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated
    “MEMORANDUM OPINION,” shall not be published, and shall not be
    cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: E2013-00229-COA-R3-JV

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 4/24/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014