Mark H. Ruth v. Robin M. Ruth ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                      IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
    AT KNOXVILLE
    Assigned on May 13, 2011
    MARK H. RUTH, v. ROBIN M. RUTH
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County
    No. E22041    Hon. Jon Kerry Blackwood, Sr. Judge
    No. E2010-02656-COA-R3-CV - FILED - May 24, 2011
    Tenn. R. App. P.3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed.
    H ERSCHEL P ICKENS F RANKS, P.J., C HARLES D. S USANO, J R., J., and D. M ICHAEL S WINEY, J.
    Robin M. Ruth, Knoxville, Tennessee, pro se.
    Mark H. Ruth, Knoxville, Tennessee, pro se.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
    This appeal is before the Court due to the failure of appellant to respond to a Show
    Cause Order in this Court as to why the appeal should not be dismissed as premature.
    The Show Cause Order in this Court said:
    1
    The Court of Appeals' Rules provide:
    Rule 10. Memorandum Opinion
    (b) This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm,
    reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have
    no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated
    "MEMORANDUM OPINION," shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in
    any unrelated case.
    A review of the record reveals that the order from which the appellant seeks
    review is not a final judgment from which an appeal as of right would lie. See
    Tenn. R. App. P. 3(a). "A judgment of contempt fixing punishment is a final
    judgment from which an appeal will lie." Hall v. Hall, 
    772 S.W.2d 432
    , 436
    (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989), per. to appeal denied. (Tenn. May 30, 1989).
    "However, a judgment of contempt without the designation of punishment is
    not a final appealable judgment." Id. The contempt judgment at issue in this
    case reserves "for a period of two (2) years from the date of entry of th[e]
    Order" the issue of "[f]urther punishment" other than the taxation to the
    appellant of all attorney's fees and costs associated with the contempt
    proceedings.
    Appellant failed to respond to this Show Cause Order, and we order this appeal
    dismissed as premature, with the cost of the appeal assessed to Robin M. Ruth.
    PER CURIAM
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: E2010-02656-COA-R3-CV

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 5/20/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014