In Re Tyler H. ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                        09/06/2022
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
    AT NASHVILLE
    September 1, 2022
    IN RE TYLER H. ET AL.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Robertson County
    No. 74CC5-2019-CV-382 Kathryn Wall Olita, Judge
    ___________________________________
    No. M2022-00744-COA-R3-PT
    ___________________________________
    A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights. Because the mother did not file
    her notice of appeal within thirty days after entry of the final order as required by Tennessee
    Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a), we dismiss the appeal.
    Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed
    FRANK G. CLEMENT, JR., P.J., M.S., W. NEAL MCBRAYER, and JEFFREY USMAN, JJ.
    Heather Elyse Haggard, Springfield, Tennessee, for the appellant, Mayron Y.
    Courtney Jayne Mohan, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Tennessee Department of
    Children’s Services.
    Tia Marie Bailiff, Portland, Tennessee, Guardian ad Litem.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION1
    The Tennessee Department of Children’s Services filed a petition to termination the
    parental rights of Mayron Y. (“Mother”) and Justin H. (“Father”) to their two children.
    Following a trial on the merits, the trial court entered a final order terminating both parents’
    parental rights on May 4, 2022. Mother filed her notice of appeal with the clerk of this
    Court on June 6, 2022. Father has not appealed.
    1
    Under the rules of this Court, as a memorandum opinion, this opinion may not be published,
    “cited[,] or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.” Tenn. Ct. App. R. 10.2
    Rule 4(a) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a notice of
    appeal be filed with the clerk of the appellate court within thirty days after entry of the
    judgment appealed. Mother did not file her notice of appeal until thirty-three days after
    entry of the judgment. On August 18, 2022, this Court ordered Mother to show cause why
    her appeal should not be dismissed for failure to file a timely notice of appeal. In response,
    Mother does not dispute that her notice of appeal is untimely but asserts that her trial
    counsel incorrectly calculated the due date and that she should not be prejudiced by her
    former counsel’s miscalculation.2
    We are reluctant to dismiss an appeal involving the termination of parental rights
    based solely on the miscalculation of a former counsel. However, the thirty-day time limit
    for filing a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. Albert v. Frye, 
    145 S.W.3d 526
    , 528 (Tenn. 2004); Binkley v. Medling, 
    117 S.W.3d 252
    , 255 (Tenn. 2003). This Court
    can neither waive nor extend the time period. Tenn. R. App. P. 2 and 21(b); Flautt & Mann
    v. Council of City of Memphis, 
    285 S.W.3d 856
    , 868 n.1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008); Jefferson
    v. Pneumo Servs. Corp., 
    699 S.W.2d 181
    , 184 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985). The failure to file a
    timely notice of appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction to hear the matter. Flautt &
    Mann, 
    285 S.W.3d at
    869 n.1. While a trial court may, under unusual and compelling
    circumstances, grant an appellant relief from the failure to file a timely notice of appeal
    under Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 60, such relief must be sought in the trial court.
    Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a), advisory commission comments; McCracken v. Brentwood United
    Methodist Church, 
    958 S.W.2d 792
    , 795 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
    The appeal is hereby dismissed for failure to file a timely notice of appeal. The case
    is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The
    costs are taxed to Mayron Y.
    PER CURIAM
    2
    Mother’s trial counsel withdrew after filing the notice of appeal, and the trial court
    appointed new counsel to represent Mother on appeal.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M2022-00744-COA-R3-PT

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 9/6/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/6/2022