King, Joshua v. Compass Heating and Air, Inc. , 2016 TN WC App. 64 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •            TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD
    Joshua T. King                              )   Docket No. 2015-03-0886
    )
    v.                                          )   State File No. 95439-2015
    )
    Compass Heating and Air, et al.             )
    )
    )
    Appeal from the Court of Workers’           )
    Compensation Claims                         )
    Pamela B. Johnson, Judge                    )
    Affirmed and Remanded—Filed November 22, 2016
    This interlocutory appeal involves an HVAC installer who alleges suffering a hernia
    while he was assisting in the installation of an air conditioning unit in the attic of an
    unfinished house. The employer denied the claim, taking the position that the employee
    could not establish a compensable injury. Following an expedited hearing, the trial court
    found the employee was likely to succeed at trial and awarded medical benefits in the
    form of a panel of physicians. The trial court also awarded temporary partial disability
    benefits. The employer has appealed the award of temporary partial disability benefits.
    We affirm the trial court’s decision and remand the case.
    Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in
    which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined.
    Joseph Ballard, Atlanta, Georgia, for the employer-appellant, Compass Heating and Air
    Martin Ellis, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the employee-appellee, Joshua T. King
    1
    Memorandum Opinion1
    Joshua King (“Employee”), an HVAC installer, alleges suffering a hernia arising
    out of and occurring in the course of his employment with Compass Heating and Air
    (“Employer”). Employee was assisting in the installation of an air conditioning unit that
    weighed approximately two hundred pounds and, upon maneuvering the unit into the
    attic of a house under construction, felt a sharp pain followed by the appearance of a
    bulge in his groin. He informed Employer of the injury, sought emergency medical care
    within a few days of the injury, and was diagnosed with an acute inguinal hernia.
    Employee has received no treatment for his injury other than his initial visit to the
    emergency room and a visit to a walk-in clinic where Employer sent him.
    It is undisputed that the emergency room physician who treated Employee placed
    him on lifting restrictions. Employee testified that when he contacted Employer about his
    restrictions, he was told there was no light duty work available for him. Employer did
    not refute this testimony. Employee has not returned to work for Employer since the date
    of his injury. He did, however, work for a period of time washing dishes at a restaurant,
    though he did not provide specific dates of that employment.
    After conducting an expedited hearing, the trial court concluded that Employee
    was likely to prevail at trial and ordered Employer to provide medical benefits in the
    form of a panel of physicians. The trial court also awarded temporary partial disability
    benefits from the last day Employee worked for Employer to the present and ongoing,
    taking into consideration the time he worked in the restaurant for another employer. On
    appeal, Employer disputes only the portion of the trial court’s order requiring it to pay
    temporary partial disability benefits.2
    An injured worker is eligible for temporary disability benefits if (1) the worker
    became disabled from working due to a compensable injury, (2) there is a causal
    connection between the injury and the inability to work, and (3) the worker established
    the duration of the period of disability. James v. Landair Transp., Inc., No. 2015-02-
    0024, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *16 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App.
    Bd. Aug. 26, 2015). Temporary partial disability benefits may be awarded when the
    temporary disability resulting from a work-related injury is not total, and such entitlement
    exists for the “time, if any, during which the injured employee is able to resume some
    1
    “The Appeals Board may, in an effort to secure a just and speedy determination of matters on appeal and
    with the concurrence of all judges, decide an appeal by an abbreviated order or by memorandum opinion,
    whichever the Appeals Board deems appropriate, in cases that are not legally and/or factually novel or
    complex.” Appeals Bd. Prac. & Proc. § 1.3.
    2
    Because neither party has raised on appeal the issue of the trial court’s award of medical benefits, we
    need not address that portion of the court’s order or discuss the proof pertinent to that issue.
    2
    gainful employment but has not reached maximum recovery.” Williams v. Saturn Corp.,
    No. M2004-01215-WC-R3-CV, 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 1032, at *6 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.
    Panel Nov. 15, 2005).
    As noted, the trial court awarded temporary partial disability benefits from the last
    day Employee worked to the present and ongoing, “taking into consideration his brief
    period of employment” in the restaurant. Employer contends that the trial court’s award
    was error because Employee did not provide the specific dates he worked at the
    restaurant. Employee attempts to address this argument by attaching to his brief a
    document purporting to show the dates of that employment.
    There are two problems with Employee’s belated effort to supply the dates he
    worked at the restaurant. First, just as an assertion of fact in a party’s brief may not be
    considered as evidence on appeal, Rezba v. Rezba, No. M2014-00553-COA-R3-CV,
    2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 7, at *7 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2015), documents not included
    in the record attached to a brief will not be considered by courts on appeal, State v.
    Anderson, No. W2008-00188-CCA-R3-CD, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 306, at *56-
    57 (Tenn. Crim. App. Apr. 9, 2010). Second, as we have noted many times,
    “[e]valuating a trial court’s decision on appeal necessarily entails taking into account
    information the trial court had before it at the time the issues were decided by the court,
    as opposed to the potentially open-ended universe of information parties may seek to
    present on appeal following an adverse decision.” Hadzic v. Averitt Express, No. 2014-
    02-0064, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14, at *13 n.4 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.
    App. Bd. May 18, 2015). Accordingly, “we will not consider on appeal testimony,
    exhibits, or other materials that were not properly admitted into evidence at the hearing
    before the trial judge.”
    Id. Although we have
    disregarded the information attached to Employee’s brief
    because it is not part of the record, Employer’s argument that the trial court erred in
    awarding temporary disability benefits is unpersuasive. The trial court ordered Employer
    to pay such benefits from the last day Employee worked for Employer to the present and
    ongoing, acknowledging there exists a period of time during which Employee was
    working for another employer that must be taken into consideration. It is undisputed that
    Employee worked for the other employer, and we agree with the trial court’s implicit
    finding it is likely he can establish the dates of that employment at trial in the event the
    parties cannot agree on those dates and the wages received during those dates.
    We hold that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court’s decision
    at this interlocutory stage of the case. Nor does the trial court’s decision violate any of
    the standards set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-217(a)(3).
    Accordingly, the trial court’s decision is affirmed, and the case is remanded for any
    further proceedings that may be necessary.
    3
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD
    Joshua T. King                                           )   Docket No.   2015-03-0886
    )
    v.                                                       )   State File No. 95439-2015
    )
    Compass Heating and Air, et al.                          )
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Appeals Board’s decision in the
    referenced case was sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service
    on this the 22nd day of November, 2016.
    Name                    Certified   First Class   Via   Fax      Via     Email Address
    Mail        Mail          Fax   Number   Email
    Martin Ellis                                                       X     mellis@ellisandellislaw.com
    Joseph W. Ballard                                                  X     joseph.ballard@thehartford.com
    Pamela B. Johnson,                                                 X     Via Electronic Mail
    Judge
    Kenneth M. Switzer,                                                X     Via Electronic Mail
    Chief Judge
    Penny Shrum, Clerk,                                                X     Penny.Patterson-Shrum@tn.gov
    Court of Workers’
    Compensation Claims
    Matthew Salyer
    Clerk, Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board
    220 French Landing Dr., Ste. 1-B
    Nashville, TN 37243
    Telephone: 615-253-1606
    Electronic Mail: Matthew.Salyer@tn.gov
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2015-03-0886

Citation Numbers: 2016 TN WC App. 64

Judges: Marshall L. Davidson III, David F. Hensley, Timothy W. Conner

Filed Date: 11/22/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/10/2021