Foust, David Michael v. Pinnacle Delivery Service ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •             TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD
    David Michael Foust, Jr.                      ) Docket No. 2017-03-0832
    )
    v.                                            ) State File No. 54975-2017
    )
    Pinnacle Delivery Service                     )
    )
    )
    Appeal from the Court of Workers’             )
    Compensation Claims                           )
    Pamela B. Johnson, Judge                      )
    Affirmed and Remanded – Filed November 17, 2017
    In this interlocutory appeal, the claimant asserted he injured his left knee while working
    as a delivery helper for the alleged employer. The purported employer argued the
    claimant was an independent contractor and did not prove he suffered an injury arising
    primarily out of and in the course and scope of the employment. Following an expedited
    hearing, the trial court determined the claimant came forward with sufficient evidence to
    show he would likely prevail at trial in proving the existence of an employment
    relationship, but he failed to come forward with sufficient evidence of the occurrence of
    an injury arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment. The
    court therefore denied benefits, and the claimant has appealed. However, the claimant
    has not filed a transcript of the expedited hearing, a statement of the evidence, or a brief.
    We affirm the decision of the trial court, deem the appeal frivolous, and remand the case
    for any further proceedings that may be necessary.
    Judge Timothy W. Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding
    Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined.
    Glen B. Rutherford, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the employee-appellant, David Michael
    Foust, Jr.
    Pinnacle Delivery Services, Knoxville, Tennessee, pro se
    1
    Memorandum Opinion1
    David Michael Foust, Jr. (“Claimant”), a forty-one-year-old resident of Knox
    County, Tennessee, worked as a delivery helper for Pinnacle Delivery Service
    (“Pinnacle”). Claimant alleged that on or about July 6, 2017, he was using a pallet jack
    to move a pallet of flooring materials up a steep driveway at a customer’s residence in
    Knox County when he fell and injured his left knee.2 Claimant sought medical treatment,
    but Pinnacle denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Moreover, Pinnacle
    asserted that it did not employ five or more persons and was not required to have
    workers’ compensation insurance pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-
    106(5) (2017).
    During the expedited hearing, Pinnacle offered into evidence bills of lading
    indicating that Claimant was not making deliveries in Knox County on the date of the
    alleged accident or the following day. In addition, the co-worker who allegedly drove the
    delivery truck on the date of the injury denied that Claimant was ever injured while they
    were working together. In response, Claimant apparently testified that he may have been
    mistaken as to the date of injury and that it could have occurred on one of four other
    dates.3
    Other than filing his notice of appeal, Claimant has not filed anything in support of
    his appeal. He provided neither a transcript of the expedited hearing nor a statement of
    the evidence. Moreover, he has not filed a brief or position statement explaining how he
    believes the trial court erred in denying his claim for temporary disability and/or medical
    benefits.
    As we have noted in numerous prior cases, our ability to conduct meaningful
    appellate review is significantly hampered when an appellant fails to provide a transcript
    of the hearing or statement of the evidence, and fails to offer any substantive argument on
    appeal. See, e.g., Walton v. Averitt Express, Inc., No. 2015-08-0306, 2017 TN Wrk.
    Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 37, at *3 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. June 2, 2017).
    Without a transcript or a statement of the evidence, we cannot know what evidence was
    presented to the trial court beyond the exhibits that were admitted into evidence and the
    1
    “The Appeals Board may, in an effort to secure a just and speedy determination of matters on appeal and
    with the concurrence of all judges, decide an appeal by an abbreviated order or by memorandum opinion,
    whichever the Appeals Board deems appropriate, in cases that are not legally and/or factually novel or
    complex.” Appeals Bd. Prac. & Proc. § 1.3.
    2
    The parties have not provided a transcript of the expedited hearing or a statement of the evidence. As a
    result, we have gleaned the facts from pleadings, exhibits, and the trial court’s expedited hearing order.
    3
    A July 13, 2017 medical record from Cherokee Health Systems indicated Claimant complained of an
    injury at work “2 weeks ago,” which does not correspond to any of the dates Claimant identified as a
    possible date of injury.
    2
    testimony as summarized in the trial court’s order. See Britt v. Chambers, No. W2006-
    00061-COA-R3-CV, 2007 Tenn. App. LEXIS 38, at *8 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2007).
    Review of a trial court’s decision is accompanied by a presumption that the factual
    findings are correct. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (2017). Accordingly, “it is
    essential that the appellate court be provided with a transcript of the trial proceedings or a
    statement of the evidence.” Britt, 2007 Tenn. App. LEXIS 38, at *7. See also Leek v.
    Powell, 
    884 S.W.2d 118
    , 121 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994) (“In the absence of a transcript or a
    statement of the evidence, we must conclusively presume that every fact admissible
    under the pleadings was found or should have been found favorably to the appellee.”).
    As noted by the Tennessee Court of Appeals, “[a]n incomplete appellate record is fatal to
    an appeal on the facts.” Piper v. Piper, No. M2005-02541-COA-R3-CV, 2007 Tenn.
    App. LEXIS 70, at *11 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2007). Moreover, a reviewing court
    “must conclusively presume that the evidence presented supported the facts as found by
    the trial court.” Whitesell v. Moore, No. M2011-02745-COA-R3-CV, 2012 Tenn. App.
    LEXIS 894, at *10 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2012).
    In the present case, Claimant has not filed a brief or position statement in support
    of his appeal and has offered no argument explaining how he believes the trial court erred
    in denying his claim, and we decline to do so for him. The trial court in this case
    concluded that Claimant had failed to present sufficient evidence to show he was likely to
    succeed at trial in proving he sustained an injury arising primarily out of and in the course
    and scope of his employment, as he was unable to identify a work injury “by time and
    place of occurrence.” See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(A) (2017). Consistent with
    established Tennessee law as discussed above, we presume the trial court’s decision on
    this issue is supported by the evidence.
    Finally, we are compelled to address the frivolous nature of this appeal. A
    frivolous appeal is one that is devoid of merit, Combustion Eng’g, Inc. v. Kennedy, 
    562 S.W.2d 202
    , 205 (Tenn. 1978), or one that has no reasonable chance of succeeding,
    Davis v. Gulf Ins. Grp., 
    546 S.W.2d 583
    , 586 (Tenn. 1977). Here, the record on appeal is
    so inadequate that we conclude Claimant’s appeal is frivolous. However, we exercise our
    discretion, on this occasion, not to award expenses to Pinnacle for Claimant’s frivolous
    appeal of the expedited hearing order. Therefore, the trial court’s order is affirmed in all
    respects, and this case is remanded for any further proceedings that may be necessary.
    3
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD
    David Michael Foust, Jr.                                     )   Docket No.   2017-03-0832
    )
    v.                                                           )   State File No. 54975-2017
    )
    Pinnacle Delivery Service                                    )
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Appeals Board’s decision in the
    referenced case was sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service
    on this the 17th day of November, 2017.
    Name                        Certified   First Class   Via   Fax      Via     Email Address
    Mail        Mail          Fax   Number   Email
    Glen B. Rutherford                                                     X     grutherford@knoxlawyers.com
    Pinnacle Delivery                                                      X     g.dupes@pinnacledeliveryservice.com
    Service, Self-Represented
    Pamela B. Johnson,                                                     X     Via Electronic Mail
    Judge
    Kenneth M. Switzer,                                                    X     Via Electronic Mail
    Chief Judge
    Penny Shrum, Clerk,                                                    X     Penny.Patterson-Shrum@tn.gov
    Court of Workers’
    Compensation Claims
    Jeanette Baird
    Deputy Clerk, Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board
    220 French Landing Dr., Ste. 1-B
    Nashville, TN 37243
    Telephone: 615-253-0064
    Electronic Mail: WCAppeals.Clerk@tn.gov
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2017-03-0832

Judges: Marshall L. Davidson III, David F. Hensley, Timothy W. Conner

Filed Date: 11/17/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/10/2021