Hancock, Jacqueline v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center , 2021 TN WC 223 ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                       FILED
    Sep 03, 2021
    12:04 PM(CT)
    TENNESSEE COURT OF
    WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    CLAIMS
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT NASHVILLE
    Jacqueline Hancock,                              )   Docket No. 2020-06-1527
    Employee,                            )
    v.                                               )
    )   State File No. 45480-2018
    )
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center,            )
    Self-Insured Employer.               )   Judge Joshua Davis Baker
    COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    The Court heard Vanderbilt’s Motion for Summary Judgment on August 31, 2021,
    on whether Ms. Hancock’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations. For the reasons
    below, the Court holds it is, and Vanderbilt is entitled to summary judgment.
    Claim History
    Ms. Hancock alleged in her petition for benefit determination that she injured her
    shoulder while preventing a patient’s fall. She reported the injury, and Vanderbilt
    authorized treatment at its occupational health clinic. The last payment for benefits
    occurred on August 1, 2018, per Vanderbilt’s worker’s compensation manager. Ms.
    Hancock filed a petition for benefit determination on October 12, 2020.
    Law and Analysis
    Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to
    interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there
    is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment
    as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04 (2020).
    As the moving party, Vanderbilt must do one of two things to prevail on its motion:
    (1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Ms. Hancock’s claim,
    or (2) demonstrate that Ms. Hancock’s evidence is insufficient to establish an essential
    1
    element of her claim. 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101
     (2020); see also Rye v. Women’s Care
    Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 
    477 S.W.3d 235
    , 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Vanderbilt does either or
    both of these things, Ms. Hancock must respond by producing specific facts showing a
    genuine issue for trial. Id.; Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.06.
    Vanderbilt argues the Court should grant summary judgment because it
    affirmatively negated an essential element of Ms. Hancock’s claim—that she timely filed
    her petition. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203(b)(2) governs the time within
    which a petition must be filed when an employer has voluntarily provided benefits, as in
    this case. Specifically, within one year after the work accident, the right to compensation
    is forever barred unless a petition for benefit determination is filed within one year from
    the time the employer “ceased to make payments of compensation to or on behalf of the
    employee.”
    Here, the undisputed facts show that Vanderbilt last made a payment of benefits on
    August 1, 2018. Ms. Hancock filed her petition on October 20, 2020, well past one year
    after the date of the last payment of benefits. Vanderbilt negated an essential element of
    her claim, and it also demonstrated that her evidence is insufficient to establish an essential
    element of her claim. Therefore, Ms. Hancock must “demonstrate the existence of specific
    facts in the record which could lead a rational trier of fact to find in her favor[.]” Rye, at
    265.
    While Ms. Hancock filed a response that characterized several facts as disputed,
    none of these alleged disputed facts concerns the salient point of Vanderbilt’s motion: Ms.
    Hancock did not file her claim within the statute of limitations. So, the disputed facts are
    immaterial to this Court’s decision.
    Here, the undisputed facts show that Ms. Hancock waited more than one year after
    Vanderbilt’s last payment for treatment before filing her petition. The Court sympathizes
    with Ms. Hancock’s circumstances, but it must abide by the time constraints within the
    Worker’s Compensation Law. Therefore, the Court finds that Vanderbilt negated an
    essential element of Ms. Hancock’s claim and proved her evidence is insufficient to
    establish she timely filed her claim. Vanderbilt’s Motion for Summary Judgment is
    granted, and Ms. Hancock’s claim is dismissed with prejudice.
    Costs are taxed to Vanderbilt under Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations
    0800-02-21-.07, to be paid within five days of this order becoming final. Vanderbilt shall
    prepare and submit the SD-2 within ten days of the date of this order. Unless appealed,
    this order shall become final in thirty days.
    ENTERED September 3, 2021.
    2
    ________________________________________
    JUDGE JOSHUA DAVIS BAKER
    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on September 3, 2021.
    Name                      Certified     Email      Sent to
    Mail
    Jacqueline Hancock            X             X      239-B Cleveland Ave.
    Lebanon, TN 37087
    jacquelinehancock@ymail.com
    Nate Cherry                                 X      ncherry@howardtatelaw.com
    _______________________________________
    Penny Shrum
    Clerk, Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
    WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
    3
    NOTICE OF APPEAL
    Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
    www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/
    wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667
    Docket No.: ________________________
    State File No.: ______________________
    Date of Injury: _____________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    Employee
    v.
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    Employer
    Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________
    [List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]
    appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the
    Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-
    stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):
    □ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________
    □ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________
    issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.
    Statement of the Issues on Appeal
    Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    Parties
    Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
    Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________
    Email: __________________________________________________________
    Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________
    Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
    Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
    LB-1099 rev. 01/20                              Page 1 of 2                                              RDA 11082
    Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________
    Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
    Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________
    Email: _________________________________________________________
    Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________
    Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
    Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a
    true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described
    in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this
    case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.
    ______________________________________________
    [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
    LB-1099 rev. 01/20                                 Page 2 of 2                                        RDA 11082
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2020-06-1527

Citation Numbers: 2021 TN WC 223

Judges: Joshua Davis Baker

Filed Date: 9/3/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/8/2021