Millinder, Charles v. Maplewood Health Care ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                   FILED
    Nov 01, 2021
    08:34 AM(CT)
    TENNESSEE COURT OF
    WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    CLAIMS
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT JACKSON
    CHARLES MILLINDER,                          )     Docket No. 2020-07-0174
    Employee,                          )
    v.                                          )
    MAPLEWOOD HEALTH CARE,                      )     State File No. 74357-2014
    Employer,                           )
    And                                         )
    OCCUSURE CLAIMS SERVICES,                   )     Judge Allen Phillips
    Carrier.                           )
    COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    The Court heard Maplewood’s Motion for Summary Judgment on October 28, 2021.
    Maplewood asserted it was entitled to summary judgment because of a medical opinion
    that Mr. Millinder’s injury did not arise primarily out of his employment. The Court agrees
    and grants the motion.
    Facts
    Maplewood filed a Statement of Undisputed Facts as required under Tennessee
    Rules of Civil Procedure 56.03, which the Court summarizes as follows:
    • Mr. Millinder alleged a back injury on September 9, 2014, and Maplewood
    provided a panel of physicians.
    • The first physician Mr. Millinder chose placed him at maximum medical
    improvement in 2016. That physician later retired.
    • Maplewood provided Mr. Millinder another panel of physicians, from which he
    chose Dr. Fereidoon Parsioon.
    • Dr. Parsioon completed a Declaration under Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure
    72 in which he agreed Mr. Millinder reached maximum medical improvement
    in 2016 with no permanent impairment related to the September 9, 2014 injury.
    1
    • Dr. Parsioon also stated that the injury did not cause any anatomical changes in
    Mr. Millinder’s back; instead, all findings were either chronic, degenerative, or
    congenital.
    • Dr. Parsioon said none of Mr. Millinder’s conditions were primarily related to
    the work injury but instead to the other conditions.
    • Dr. Parsioon recommended no further treatment for the work injury.
    Mr. Millinder did not file a written response.
    Based on the undisputed facts, Maplewood argued it was entitled to summary
    judgment because Dr. Parsioon said that the injury did not arise primarily out of the
    employment. Mr. Millinder admitted he filed no response to the motion and could not
    dispute Maplewood’s facts.
    Analysis
    Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56 provides specific filing requirements for
    both parties in summary judgment cases that “are not mere suggestions” but rather plain
    and unambiguous requirements. Thomas v. Zipp Express, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
    LEXIS 22, at *11 n.4 (Mar. 15, 2017).
    Specifically, as the moving party, Maplewood must file a statement of undisputed
    material facts with citations to the record. It did so. As the nonmoving party, Mr. Millinder
    must respond to Maplewood’s statement of undisputed facts, indicating his agreement with
    them or demonstrating how they are disputed. Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.03. He did not do so.
    Thus, the Court considers Maplewood’s motion unopposed and considers whether
    summary judgment is appropriate.
    Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to
    interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there
    is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment
    as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04. To prevail, Maplewood must do one of two
    things: (1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Mr. Millinder’s
    claim, or (2) demonstrate that his evidence is insufficient to establish entitlement to
    benefits. 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101
     (2021). See also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. Of
    Memphis, MPLLC., 
    477 S.W.3d 235
    , 264 (Tenn. 2015).
    Under law, Mr. Millinder must show that his injury was caused by a specific incident
    arising primarily out of his employment. 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102
    (14)(A) (Emphasis
    added). Based on the undisputed facts, Maplewood negated the essential element of the
    injury arising primarily out of the employment through Dr. Parsioon’s declaration.
    Specifically, Dr. Parsioon said Mr. Millinder’s conditions were primarily related to other
    2
    conditions, not the injury. In the absence of any countervailing facts, Maplewood is entitled
    to judgment as a matter of law.
    THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
    1. The Court grants Maplewood’s Motion for Summary Judgment on grounds that
    Mr. Millinder’s injury did not primarily arise out of his employment, and his
    claim against Maplewood is dismissed with prejudice to its refiling.
    2. Unless appealed, this order shall become final in thirty days.
    3. The Court assesses the $150.00 filing fee against Maplewood, for which
    execution might issue as necessary. Maplewood shall pay the filing fee to the
    Clerk within five business days of the order becoming final.
    4. Maplewood shall file Form SD-2, Statistical Data form, with the Clerk within
    five business days of this order becoming final.
    ENTERED November 1, 2021.
    _____________________________________
    JUDGE ALLEN PHILLIPS
    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on November 1, 2021.
    Name                        Email        Service sent to:
    Spencer R. Barnes,                       X           spence@morrisonandbarnes.com
    Employee’s Attorney                                  kaylie@morrisonandbarnes.com
    B. Duane Willis,                          X          dwillis@morganakins.com
    Employer’s Attorney
    ______________________________________
    Penny Shrum, Court Clerk
    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
    WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
    3
    Compensation Hearing Order Right to Appeal:
    If you disagree with this Compensation Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
    Compensation Appeals Board or the Tennessee Supreme Court. To appeal to the Workers’
    Compensation Appeals Board, you must:
    1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk
    of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the date the
    compensation hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve
    a copy upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).
    2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
    calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any
    Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative,
    you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any
    Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fullycompleted
    Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to
    timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of
    your appeal.
    3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
    from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. A licensed court
    reporter must prepare a transcript and file it with the court clerk within fifteen calendar
    days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the
    evidence prepared jointly by both parties within fifteen calendar days of the filing of the
    Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate
    account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement of
    the evidence before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is
    called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the absence of
    a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to meaningful
    appellate review.
    4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the court clerk transmits
    it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties. The appealing party
    has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board.
    See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.
    To appeal your case directly to the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Compensation Hearing
    Order must be final and you must comply with the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will
    become final by operation of law thirty calendar days after entry. See 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239
    (c)(7).
    For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
    NOTICE OF APPEAL
    Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-
    work/
    wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667
    Docket No.: ________________________
    State File No.: ______________________
    Date of Injury: _____________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    Employee
    v.
    ___________________________________________________________________________ Employer
    Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________ [List
    name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]
    appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the Workers’
    Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date filestamped on
    the first page of the order(s) being appealed):
    □ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________
    □ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________ issued
    by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.
    Statement of the Issues on Appeal
    Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    Parties
    Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
    Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________
    Email: __________________________________________________________
    Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________
    Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
    Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
    LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2       RDA 11082 Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.:
    _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________
    Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
    Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________
    Email: _________________________________________________________
    Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________
    Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
    Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a
    true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described
    in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this
    case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.
    ____________________________________________
    __ [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
    LB-1099 rev. 01/20   Page 2 of 2   RDA 11082
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2020-07-0174

Judges: Allen Phillips

Filed Date: 11/1/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/1/2021