Stansbury, Pamela v. Federal Exprress Corp. ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                      FILED
    Dec 20, 2021
    12:52 PM(CT)
    TENNESSEE COURT OF
    WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    CLAIMS
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT MEMPHIS
    PAMELA STANSBURY,                         )     Docket No.:      2021-08-0423
    Employee,                              )
    v.                                        )
    )
    FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.,                    )     State File No.: 69937-2020
    Employer,                             )
    And                                       )
    )
    ABIGAIL HUDGENS, Admin. of                )     Judge Dale Tipps
    SUBSEQUENT INJURY                         )
    FUND FOR THE TENN.                        )
    BUREAU OF WORKERS’                        )
    COMPENSATION.                             )
    EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER
    DENYING BENEFITS
    The Court held an Expedited Hearing on December 14, 2021, to determine whether
    Ms. Stansbury is likely to prove at a hearing on the merits that she is entitled to additional
    medical and temporary disability benefits. Although all agreed that Ms. Stansbury suffered
    a compensable head injury, the Court holds that she did not meet her burden for the
    requested benefits and denies them at this time.
    History of Claim
    While working at FedEx, Ms. Stansbury was struck in the head on October 21, 2020.
    FedEx provided a panel of physicians, from which she selected Dr. Alan Nadel.
    Dr. Nadel diagnosed a mild posttraumatic headache, prescribed medication, and
    took Ms. Stansbury off work. After seeing her several times, he released her with no work
    restrictions on April 1, 2021, finding that nothing suggested any residual neurologic
    problems.
    FedEx made temporary total disability payments from the date of injury until Dr.
    Nadel released her to return to work. However, due to the pandemic and transportation
    problems, Ms. Stansbury was unable to cash or deposit several of the temporary disability
    checks. The parties announced an agreement at the start of the hearing that FedEx would
    examine its payment records and reissue any disability benefits that had not been cashed
    or deposited.
    In addition to the temporary disability benefit issue, Ms. Stansbury also sought
    payment of medical expenses she says she incurred for emergency treatment before FedEx
    offered her a panel. Further, she expressed dissatisfaction with Dr. Nadel’s treatment.
    FedEx contended that it has provided all the medical treatment and disability
    payments to which Ms. Stansbury is entitled. It argued that Ms. Stansbury did not present
    any evidence supporting her claim for additional benefits or a different medical provider.
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
    For the Court to grant Ms. Stansbury’s requests, she must prove she is likely to
    prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord
    v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9
    (Mar. 27, 2015). FedEx does not contest the compensability of her injury. Therefore, the
    question is whether she is likely to show she is entitled to the additional requested benefits.
    Medical Benefits
    Ms. Stansbury requested additional medical treatment and payment of past medical
    expenses.
    Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(1)(A) provides that the employer
    shall furnish, free of charge to the employee, medical treatment made reasonably necessary
    by the accident. Further, the employer shall designate a group of three or more independent
    reputable physicians, from which the employee shall select one to be the treating physician.
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i).
    Ms. Stansbury selected Dr. Nadel from a panel, and FedEx authorized treatment
    with him for several months. She offered no proof that FedEx ever refused to authorize a
    return to Dr. Nadel or that he refused to see Ms. Stansbury after he released her. Further,
    although Ms. Stansbury was dissatisfied with Dr. Nadel’s treatment and felt she would
    have done better with another doctor, she has not offered medical proof or identified any
    legal basis that would justify an order changing her authorized physician.1
    1
    Ms. Stansbury was very frustrated about her inability to get copies of Dr. Nadel’s records, either from him
    or from FedEx, and she characterized this as a coverup. While the Court is sympathetic, it has no remedy
    Regarding the medical expenses, in certain circumstances an employer might be
    held responsible for medical benefits obtained from a medical provider of the employee’s
    choice. See McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
    LEXIS 6, at *13 (Mar. 27, 2015). However, Ms. Stansbury stated in her petition that she
    received a panel of physicians “around October 28,” or about a week after the accident.
    She presented no proof that FedEx knew of her need for emergency room treatment or
    failed to provide it. Without that evidence, the Court cannot order FedEx to pay for her
    unauthorized treatment.
    For these reasons, Ms. Stansbury has not proven she is likely to prevail on her claims
    for additional medical benefits.
    Temporary Disability Benefits
    To receive temporary total disability benefits, Ms. Stansbury must prove (1) she
    became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection
    between her injury and her inability to work; and (3) her period of disability. For temporary
    partial disability benefits, she must show that her treating physician returned her to work
    with restrictions that FedEx either could not or would not accommodate. See Jones v.
    Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7, 8 (Dec. 11,
    2015).
    Beginning with the first category of benefits, the only medical opinion is Dr. Nadel’s
    conclusion that Ms. Stansbury was unable to work after the injury until March 31, 2021.
    FedEx has paid temporary disability benefits for that entire period (or will pay under the
    parties’ agreement). As to temporary partial disability, Ms. Stansbury offered no medical
    evidence of any work restrictions. Therefore, she is not likely to prove entitlement to
    additional temporary disability benefits.
    IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
    1. Ms. Stansbury’s claims against FedEx for additional benefits are denied at this time.
    2. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on March 9, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. You must
    call toll-free at 855-874-0473 to participate. Failure to call might result in a
    determination of the issues without your further participation. All conferences are
    set using Central Time.
    ENTERED December 20, 2021.
    available under the current posture of the case.
    _____________________________________
    Judge Dale Tipps
    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
    APPENDIX
    Exhibits:
    1. Ms. Stansbury’s Rule 72 Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury
    2. Wage Statement
    3. Dr. Nadel’s treatment notes
    4. Dr. Nadel’s Form C-30A (identification only)
    5. EMT records
    6. October 29, 2020 LaBonheur record (identification only)
    7. Methodist Minor Medical record (identification only)
    8. October 29, 2020 St. Francis record (identification only)
    9. October 29, 2020 emergency room discharge record
    10. October 29, 2020 St. Francis Final Report (identification only)
    11. Emergency discharge instructions (identification only)
    12. Records from Church Health (identification only)
    13. Petition for Benefit Determination
    Technical record:
    1. Petition for Benefit Determination
    2. Dispute Certification Notice
    3. Request for Expedited Hearing
    4. FedEx’s Pre-Hearing Brief
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on
    December 20, 2021.
    Name                   Certified   Via      Via Service sent to:
    Mail       Fax     Email
    Pamela Stansbury          X                  X Pstans20@gmail.com
    Stephen Miller,                             X    smiller@mckuhn.com
    Employer’s Attorney
    Timothy Kellum,                              X    Timothy.kellum@tn.gov
    SIVRF Attorney
    ______________________________________
    PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK
    wc.courtclerk@tn.gov
    Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:
    If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
    Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:
    1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the
    Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the
    date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must
    serve a copy upon all parties.
    2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
    calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at
    any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the
    alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s
    website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-
    completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of
    Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will
    result in dismissal of the appeal.
    3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
    from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of
    the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file
    it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of
    Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both
    parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of
    the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’
    Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the
    Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof
    concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be
    a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.
    4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten
    business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The
    party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business
    days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a
    statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the
    expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of
    the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an
    argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.
    For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
    NOTICE OF APPEAL
    Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
    www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/
    wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667
    Docket No.: ________________________
    State File No.: ______________________
    Date of Injury: _____________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    Employee
    v.
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    Employer
    Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________
    [List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]
    appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the
    Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-
    stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):
    □ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________
    □ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________
    issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.
    Statement of the Issues on Appeal
    Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    Parties
    Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
    Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________
    Email: __________________________________________________________
    Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________
    Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
    Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
    LB-1099 rev. 01/20                              Page 1 of 2                                              RDA 11082
    Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________
    Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
    Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________
    Email: _________________________________________________________
    Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________
    Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
    Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a
    true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described
    in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this
    case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.
    ______________________________________________
    [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
    LB-1099 rev. 01/20                                 Page 2 of 2                                        RDA 11082
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2021-08-0423

Judges: Dale Tipps

Filed Date: 12/20/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/22/2021